The 5D4 has a bit lower res, but then again, the DR advantage. I remember the AF being VERY good on the 5DSR. In fact, more consistent than 5D4 if I remember correctly. boldcolors's gear list: Canon EOS 5DS R Pentax K-3 II Canon EOS R8 Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG HSM +4 more.
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Canon EOS R3 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM +6 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
Watch my follow-up, long-term review of the 5D Mark II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga07x8SsANUSUBSCRIBE and like http://fb.com/NorthrupPhotographyBuy the
I waited until all the new cameras were announced but I am now unsure which to move forward with 5D Mark IV or the 5DSr. The camera will mainly be used for landscape photography and the very occasional wildlife. It will be used with 16-35L IS, 24-70 II, 70-300L. The only advantage I see in the 5DSr is the higher resolution.
Nikon F6 Vs F100, both film cameras. F6 is the new kid, all fancy and high-tech compared to F100. F6’s got speedy autofocus, crazy frame rates, and can even print camera settings. Now, the F100 is like the budget-friendly champ. Good for street pics, adjustable autofocus points – it’s got some tricks up its sleeve.
I was excited about it. Then I began reading other, more recent, reviews that complained about the camera's inferior dynamic range on various review sites, includeing Peta Pixel and DP Review. This has now given me pause. I must now consider the REFURBISHED 5D Mark III as the price difference between them is about $100.

The print size we have chosen is a standard 300dpi 8"x12" format, which corresponds to about the physical size of an 8Mpix image printed at 100% magnification. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II View tested lens

At this point, I don't miss my 1DX II at all. I find my hit rate on the R6 to be higher. The AF is just better. High ISO is better. I also enjoy seeing the photo I'm going to take in the viewfinder and knowing the exposure is going to be correct. Remember, the R6 uses the same processor, sensor, and live view AF as the 1DX Mark III.
The video resolution is a tad bit better on the 5D Mark IV with 4,096 x 2,160 (DCI 4K) compared to 3,840 x 2,160 (4K) on the EOS R, but the EOS R still takes the cake in that department with a 10-bit output, EVF and 180-degree tilt-screen. Although minor, the EOS R has a slight edge over the 5D Mark IV.
Canon EOS R5 Design, Build Quality, and Handling. Despite being smaller than a full-frame Canon DLSR, the Canon R5 feels great to hold. It is not that lightweight, that’s for sure. But with the added weight comes the assurance of durability and ruggedness, while still remaining lighter than let's say, the Canon 5D mark IV.
Canon has added to its EOS 5D range with the launch of two 50MP cameras, the 5DS and the 5DS R. Both cameras are high-resolution full frame models, primarily aimed at stills photographers. The only difference between the models is that the 'S' has an optical low-pass filter, while the 'S R' has a self-cancelling filter (the same relationship as Nikon's D800 and D800E models shared). We've put JOIN CPS NOW. "Silent LV (Live View) shooting can also be enabled in the menu of a number of EOS cameras, including the EOS R, EOS 5D Mark IV and EOS 7D Mark II. With this set to Mode 1, the usual shutter sound is suppressed, but the camera operates as normal and continuous shooting is possible. Set it to Mode 2, and you can press the shutter

The net result was that the 5D Mark IV made the model look a little more heavy than the 1DX Mark II with the image quality being very good for both. The heavier look wasn't real but rather an illusion created due to the model and lens not being an EXACT distance from each other and comparing two files that weren't the exact same size.

Having two major DSLRs launched into the same marketplace aimed at the same kind of photographers at the same time is a good opportunity to see how they compare. We've recently published full, detailed reviews of both the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II and Nikon D5, but in this article we'll be highlighting the major differences between the two models.
Mark IV → 2016-08 (4½ years) Successor → only 2¾ years so far. The EOS-1Dx line is only slightly different: 1Ds Mark I → 2002-09 1Ds Mark II → 2004-11 (2 years) 1Ds Mark III → 2007-11
The print size we have chosen is a standard 300dpi 8"x12" format, which corresponds to about the physical size of an 8Mpix image printed at 100% magnification. Canon EOS-1D X Mark II View tested lens
Tony Northrup's video comparing the R5 and R6 declared the following: * R6 "noticeably" better than the R5 at standard 4K/30 (both low and high ISO) * R6 is equal to the R5 for 4k/30 HQ. * R6 with 4K/30 (HQ Mode) overheats in 39 minutes. * R5 overheats in 22-28 minutes in the comparable 4K HQmode. This image is definitely still in the useable/recoverable range of acceptable quality for me. It’s probably the top end of the scale, which is something I always want to define, but for the 5D Mark IV that top end was ISO 4000 regularly, and ISO 5000 in emergencies. Finding out that I can push the 1D X Mark II to ISO 10,000 in emergencies is

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV – Video. Canon was a bit of a revolutionary when it came to video, the 5D Mark II being the first of its kind to feature Full HD video recording. Now we’ve progressed to

.